The camp of Chief Justice Renato Corona on Wednesday concluded that the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) report claiming the chief justice maintains 82 dollar accounts was fabricated.
In a statement, the defense camp said they made the conclusion after going over the 17-page AMLC report from which the PowerPoint presentation of hostile witness Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales was based.
In the presentation made before the Senate impeachment court last Monday, the Ombudsman showed how Corona allegedly staged “circuitous” transactions in five banks from 2003 to 2011.
“We have already studied the AMLC report and we can say that it is not accurate. We will prove that it is a fabricated evidence,” said defense lawyer and spokesperson Rico Paolo Quicho.
The lawyer did not elaborate how they were able to tell the document was fabricated, saying they are reserving that opportunity in the next days.
“We do not take solace to the transactions as stated in the documents provided by AMLC because we know that this is false and fabricated. In due time, we will be showing our people that government forces against the Chief Justice are really desperate to pin him down,” he said.
Earlier, Quicho accused the Aquino administration of orchestrating moves to “discredit its perceived political enemies at the expense of institutional independence and integrity.”
“We deplore how independent agencies and bodies such as the Ombudsman, the AMLC, the Commission on Audit, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, have been used to score political and media brownie points,” he said.
Quicho criticized both the AMLC and Morales for investigating Corona’s accounts without any court order and without giving the chief magistrate prior notice about the probe, as required under Section 11 of the Anti-Money Laundering Act.
“Did the Ombudsman have the permission of the Senate impeachment court? Obviously, no… This has been ignored because the Ombudsman says so,” Quicho said.
He also cited Republic Act 6426 or the Foreign Currency Deposit Act, which prevents the examination of a depositor’s dollar accounts without his or her consent.
Quicho emphasized that the AMLC report presented by the Ombudsman was not signed and authenticated.
“The Ombudsman is not a competent witness. It is important to go to the source documents, which is a another issue,” he said.
On Wednesday, Sen. Edgardo Angara said Corona’s accounts could already be scrutinized because of the waiver he signed in his statement of assets, liabilities, and net worth (SALN).
It was the defense panel who asked the Ombudsman to testify, and that should qualify the presentation of the alleged dollar accounts to the public, the lawmaker added.
In a statement on Tuesday, Corona had already reiterated that he would not resign from his post, saying: “Tuloy ang laban.” —VS, GMA News